Category: Blog Comments

Comments for Zoe Jacobson’s Post #4

Hi Zoe!

I wanted to respond to your blog post because I noticed that we had the same video, and also similar critiques of the video, such as how this video would work very well as an EdPuzzle activity.

Something you mentioned in your post, that I did not, was the drawbacks of using EdPuzzle activities. While this is a really excellent resource, you are right to bring up the barriers presented with these activities. While it is common to think of online tools and resources as being more accessible and inclusive, those barriers are still in place. While considering various barriers such as students who are visually impaired or hard of hearing, or simply struggle with reading, it is important to address ways that we can adapt the EdPuzzle to meet the accessibility needs of all students. Your suggestions of how we can make EdPuzzle more accessible are fantastic, accessible, but also realistic which is very important. These are adaptations and accommodations that are easy to implement and make the most sense to include in all online activities that students will participate in. Overall this was a great post and I am so glad that you addressed these accessibility requirements!

Comments For Catriona Boyrs Post #3

Hi Catriona,

I appreciate the connections you made between the Universal Design for Learning and the adaptations, adjustments and accessibility surrounding the recent COVID-19 Pandemic. When the pandemic first hit, it was such a dramatic shift of what used to be traditional classroom teaching, and somehow adapting it to work as a fully online process. I remember so clearly wondering about accessibility and inclusion when classes went fully remote, especially for younger students in the k-12 system. I was asking myself questions such as “are all students going to have fair internet and technology access from home?” or “do all students have the knowledge and skills to operate their learning from a home computer?” and many more questions arose during this time. I applaud teachers and educators who did what they could during that sharp and swift transition between in-person and remote learning, as that was extremely stressful and challenging. Thankfully, two years later, we can see that educators have been able to make more changes to online education to fit into the UDL principles. With time and growth, I believe that online education is slowly becoming more accessible for every student, regardless of their abilities, which is a very impactful and important change to see in education.

Comments for Kathryn Ebert’s Post #2

Hi Kathryn,

Thank you for your incredibly in-depth inquiry into project-based teaching. I have found your research to be very informative and thorough. This is a topic that I have learned about in many university courses and am always eager to learn more about it and how I can implement it in my future career as a teacher.

A portion of your inquiry that I find to be most impactful and interesting is the part about finding a balance between the teacher leading, and the students guiding themselves in a project-based learning environment. That balance is hard to find, but I think you have found a good solution to create that balance, and that is with scaffolding. I agree when you said that it is important to not overstep the boundary as a teacher so as to not impede student learning, but you also do not want to cause stress and overwhelm the students either. Scaffolding the ways of learning and how projects are carried out will help create that desired project-based learning classroom. You can start the school year by having the teacher lead almost everything, and then slowly transition and let students take small steps to take initiative in their learning and guide themselves through projects. Hopefully, by the end of the school year, the students would feel comfortable doing a free inquiry project and doing things with minimal teacher involvement.

Alecia

Comments for Hannah Rochford’s Post #1

Hannah’s Blog Post #1 is linked here.

Hi Hannah,

I agree with your section about realizing that you have more of a constructivist style of teaching. I too had the same revelations that you did when doing the readings for this week. I also find that constructivism aligns with teaching students at a more individual level and meeting each student’s needs in the classroom (Ertmer & Newby, 2017). I like how with constructivism, the idea is that students can contribute to their learning just as much as a teacher would, which creates that unique and special learning environment and process, but also help students and teachers be seen more on an equal level in terms of learning capacities and capabilities.

Thank you for your post. It is always nice to read someone’s writing when they have a similar mindset to your own,

Alecia

Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. (2017). Behaviourism, Cognitivism, Constructivism Comparing Critical Features From an Instructional Design Perspective. Edtechbooks. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/lidtfoundations/behaviorism_cognitivism_constructivism

© 2024 EDCI 335 Blog 2022

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑